We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Print Price: $66.00

Format:
Paperback
288 pp.
2 b/w line drawings, 6.125" x 9.25"

ISBN-13:
9780199858736

Publication date:
August 2013

Imprint: OUP US


Aspects of Split Ergativity

Jessica Coon

Series : Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax

In languages with aspect-based split ergativity, one portion of the grammar follows an ergative pattern, while another shows a "split." In this book, Jessica Coon argues that aspectual split ergativity does not mark a split in how case is assigned, but rather, a split in sentence structure. Specifically, the contexts in which we find the appearance of a nonergative pattern in an otherwise ergative language involve added structure - a disassociation between the syntactic predicate and the stem carrying the lexical verb stem.

The book begins with an analysis of split person marking patterns in Chol, a Mayan language of southern Mexico. Here appearance of split ergativity follows naturally from the fact that the progressive and the imperfective morphemes are verbs, while the perfective morpheme is not. The fact that the nonperfective morphemes are verbs, combined with independent properties of Chol grammar, results in the appearance of a split.

This book further surveys aspectual splits in a variety of unrelated languages and offers an explanation for the universal directionality of split ergativity: in splits, ergativity is always retained in the perfective aspect. Following Laka's (2006) proposal for Basque, Coon proposes that the cross-linguistic tendency for imperfective aspects to pattern with locative constructions is responsible for the biclausality which causes the appearance of a nonergative pattern. Building on Demirdache and Uribe-Etxebarria's (2000) prepositional account of spatiotemporal relations, Coon proposes that the perfective is never periphrastic - and thus never involves a split - because there is no preposition in natural language that correctly captures the relation of the assertion time to the event time denoted by the perfective aspect.

Readership : Suitable for scholars and graduate students of syntax, cartography, and psycholinguistics.

1. Introduction
Part I Complementation in Chol
2. Mayan background and clause structure
3. Verbs and nouns in Chol
4. Explaining split ergativity in Chol
Part II A theory of split ergativity
5. Beyond Mayan
6. The grammar of temporal relations
7. Conclusion
Appendix A Abbreviations
Appendix B Narrative text abbreviations
Appendix C Summary of basic constructions

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Jessica Coon is Assistant Professor of Linguistics at McGill University. She completed her PhD at MIT in 2010 and spent one year as a post-doc at Harvard before accepting a SSHRC Banting Post-doctoral Research Fellowship at McGill University. She joined the faculty at McGill in 2011. Her work focuses on the morphology and syntax of under-documented languages. She has more than a decade of experience working on languages of the Mayan family.

Making Sense - Margot Northey and Joan McKibbin
Variation in Datives - Edited by Beatriz Fernandez and Edited by Ricardo Etxepare
Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections - Silvio Cruschina
Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery - Liliane Haegeman

Special Features

  • Argues that aspect-based split ergativity does not mark a split in how Case is assigned, but rather, a split in sentence structure.
  • Analyzes split person marking patterns in Chol, a Mayan language of southern Mexico.