1. M. Freeman: Introduction
2. W. Glannon: What Neuroscience can (and cannot) tell us about criminal responsibility
3. G-J Lokhorst: Mens Rea, Logic and The Brain
4. J. Fischer: Indeterminism and Control: An approach to the problem of luck
5. H. T. Greely: Neuroscience and
Criminal Responsibility: Proving "Can't Help Himself" as a narrow bar to criminal liability
6. N. Vincent: Madness, Badness and Neuro-imagining-based responsibility assessments
7. A. L. Roskies and W. Sinnott-Armstrong: Brain Images as Evidence in the Criminal Law
8. J. Buckholtz et al:
The Neural Correlates of Third-Party Punishment
9. L. Claydon: Law, Neuroscience and Criminal Culpability
10. T. Y. Blumoff: How (some) Criminals are Made
11. D. Terracina: Neuroscience and Penal Law: Ineffectiveness of the penal systems and flawed perception of the underevaluation of
behaviour constituting crime
12. B. J. Grey: Neuroscience and Emotional Harm in Tort Law: Rethinking the American approach to freestanding emotional distress claims
13. J. Carbone: Neuroscience and Ideology: Why science can never supply a complete answer for adolescent immaturity
14. T.
Maroney: Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice
15. R. MacKenzie and M. Sakel: The Neuroscience of Cruelty as Brain Damage: Legal framings of capacity and ethical issues in the neurorehabilitation of Motor Neurone Disease
16. D. Wilkinson and C . Foster: The Carmentis Machine: Legal
and ethical issues in the use of neuroimaging to guide treatment withdrawal in newborn infants
17. D. Fox: The Right to Silence as Protecting Mental Control
18. J. J. Fins: Minds Apart: Severe brain injury, citizenship and civil rights
19. A. M. Viens: Reciprocity and Neuroscience in
Public Health Law
20. C. Boudreau, S Coulson and M. D. McCubbins: Pathways to Persuasion: How neuroscience can inform the study and practice of law
21. L. Capraro: The Juridical Rise of Emotions in the Decisional Process of Popular Juries
22. D. W. Pfaff: Possible Neural Mechanisms
Underlying Ethical Behaviour
23. J. D. Duffy: What Hobbes Left Out: The neuroscience of comparison and its implications for a new Commonwealth
24. S. Goldberg: Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion
25. E. Cárceres: Steps toward a Constructivist and Coherentist Theory of Judicial
Reasoning in Civil Law Tradition
26. M. B. Hoffman: Evolutionary Jurisprudence: The end of the naturalistic fallacy and the beginning of natural reform?
27. D. S. Goldberg: The History of Scientific and Clinical Images in Mid-to-Late 19th Century American Legal Culture: Implications for
contemporary law and neuroscience
28. S. J. Morse: Lost in Translation? An essay on law and neuroscience
There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.
Michael Freeman is Professor of English Law at University College London and is the series editor for Current Legal Issues.
Making Sense - Margot Northey and Joan McKibbin