We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Print Price: $54.95

Format:
Paperback
416 pp.
156 mm x 234 mm

ISBN-13:
9780199552177

Publication date:
July 2008

Imprint: OUP UK


Human Rights and the WTO

The Case of Patents and Access to Medicines

Holger Hestermeyer

Series : International Economic Law Series

The international trading system has come under increasing attack by activists as being in conflict with human rights law. Others have defended the system as contributing more to the fulfilment of human rights than many other areas of international law. This study examines the alleged conflict of WTO law with international human rights law, using one of the most prominent examples of such a conflict: that between international patent law, ie the TRIPS Agreement, and access to medication as guaranteed eg by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. This highly controversial political issue of the appropriate use of international patent law on life saving medicines gained the world's attention during the discussion about the price of AIDS medication, but recent instances also include the availability of the patented medication for bird flu and for anthrax.

The book discusses both the patent law and the international human rights law involved in great depth, distinguishing between obligations under different human rights instruments and including a highly readable introduction into both areas of law. It then explains the concept of conflict between legal regimes and why patent law and human rights law are in conflict. The current state of international law on the conflict between legal regimes and the origin of such conflicts is analyzed, covering such issues as hierarchy in international law and introducing the concept of 'factual hierarchy'. The book then turns to the role of human rights law in the WTO system, concluding that such law currently is limited to aiding the interpreting of the WTO agreements. It shows how a further integration of human rights law could be achieved and describes the progress made towards accommodating human rights concerns within the TRIPS Agreement, culminating in the first ever decision to amend a core WTO Agreement in December 2005.

Readership : Academics, scholars, and advanced students or WTO law, international human rights, and international patents. Also Human Rights Activists, WTO and WIPO practitioners, and representatives of WTO Members

1. Background to the Debate
2. Patent Law
3. Access to Medication as a Human Right
4. Conflict Between Patents and Access to Medication
5. Access to Medication as a Human Right in the WTO Order

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Dr. Hestermeyer graduated from Münster University Law School (Germany), received an LL.M. from the University of California at Berkeley (USA) and a doctorate from Hamburg University's School of Law (Germany). He worked as a junior researcher at Heidelberg's Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public and Public International Law, clerked in Hamburg and worked as a trainee solicitor for the German Foreign Office as well as law firms in Hamburg, Madrid and Alicante. He returned to Heidelberg's Max Planck Institute as a research fellow in 2006. Dr. Hestermeyer is admitted to the New York State Bar, he is a former Fulbright Fellow, German National Merit Foundation Fellow and German National Merit Foundation Doctoral Fellow.

There are no related titles available at this time.

Special Features

  • A politically controversial examination of the use of patents on life-saving medicines
  • Examines one of the key debates surrounding the world trading system, that of the importance of protecting international human rights norms as part of the WTO legal order
  • A fresh examination of the conflict between international patents law and international human rights law