We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Print Price: $71.50

Format:
Hardback
232 pp.
163 mm x 239 mm

ISBN-13:
9780190239534

Publication date:
January 2016

Imprint: OUP US


Windows of Opportunity

How Women Seize Peace Negotiations for Political Change

Miriam J. Anderson

Series : Oxford Studies in Gender & International Relations

In 1915, women from over thirty countries met in The Hague to express opposition to the war and propose ways to end it. The delegates called for three things: for women to be present at all international peace conferences, a women's-only peace conference to be convened alongside any official negotiations, and the establishment of universal suffrage. While these demands went unmet at the time, contemporary women's groups continue to seek to participate in peace negotiations and to have language promoting gender equality inserted into all peace agreements. In fact, between 1989 and 2005, almost half of all peace processes led to agreements with references to women.

Many of these clauses addressed compensation for wartime gender-based violence and guarantees for women's participation in the post-conflict transitional period. Others included electoral quotas and changes to inheritance legislation. Curiously, the language used is fairly consistent across agreements, and that is because it reflects international women's rights norms rather than more local norms. But why is it that, if a peace agreement's primary objective is to end conflict, some include potentially controversial provisions about gender that might delay or complicate reaching an agreement? Why do these provisions echo international norms when we might expect each agreement to reflect varying cultural norms? And which factors make it more likely that women's rights will appear in peace agreements? Windows of Opportunity answers these questions by looking at peace negotiations in Burundi, Macedonia, and Northern Ireland. It looks at the key actors in negotiations, what prompts their mobilization, their objectives, their strategies, how they construct clauses for inclusion in peace agreements, how women's roles in the state are impacted in the wake of peace agreements, and how these variables increase the likelihood of success for women's movements.

Readership : Most readers will likely be academics, graduate, and upper-level undergraduate students in political science and sociology. Also, practitioners in international organizations and in non-governmental organizations working on gender issues in peace negotiations, conflict and post-conflict should comprise the next largest group of readers.

Acknowledgments
1. Introduction
2. Women's Rights in Peace Agreements
3. Contextualizing Women and Peace Agreements
4. Burundi
5. Northern Ireland
6. Macedonia
7. Findings
8. Conclusions
9. Appendices
Notes
Index

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Miriam Anderson is Assistant Professor in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada.

Making Sense in the Social Sciences - Margot Northey, Lorne Tepperman and Patrizia Albanese
Burundi - Nigel Watt
The Northern Ireland Conflict - John McGarry and Brendan O'Leary
Intelligent Compassion - Catia Cecilia Confortini
Building Peace in Northern Ireland - edited by Maria Power

Special Features

  • The first work published on Macedonian women's groups during the country's civil war in 2001.
  • Provides a comprehensive overview of women's rights in peace agreements between 1975 and 2011.
  • Argues that peace negotiations are opportunities for women to achieve feminist objectives.