We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Print Price: $126.00

Format:
Hardback
240 pp.
6.125" x 9.25"

ISBN-13:
9780199336975

Publication date:
September 2013

Imprint: OUP US


Wrap Contracts

Foundations and Ramifications

Nancy S. Kim

When you visit a website, check your email, or download music, you enter into a contract that you probably don't know exists. "Wrap contracts" - shrinkwrap, clickwrap and browsewrap agreements - are non-traditional contracts that look nothing like legal documents. Contrary to what courts have held, they are not "just like" other standard form contracts, and consumers do not perceive them the same way. Wrap contract terms are more aggressive and permit dubious business practices, such as the collection of personal information and the appropriation of user-created content. In digital form, wrap contracts are weightless and cheap to reproduce. Given their low cost and flexible form, businesses engage in "contracting mania" where they use wrap contracts excessively and in a wide variety of contexts. Courts impose a duty to read upon consumers but don't impose a duty upon businesses to make contracts easy to read. The result is that consumers are subjected to onerous legalese for nearly every online interaction.

In Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications, Nancy Kim explains why wrap contracts were created, how they have developed, and what this means for society. She explains how businesses and existing law unfairly burden users and create a coercive contracting environment that forces users to "accept" in order to participate in modern life. Kim's central thesis is that how a contract is presented affects and reveals the intent of the parties. She proposes doctrinal solutions - such as the duty to draft reasonably, specific assent, and a reconceptualization of unconscionability - which fairly balance the burden of wrap contracts between businesses and consumers.

Readership : Suitable for professors and students of contract law, professors and students interested in internet and computer law, and judges, legislators and policy makers.

1. Introduction
2. Why Enforce Contracts?
A. Individualistic/Deontic Theories
B. Consequentialist Theories
C. Dynamic or "Multi-Value" Theories of Contract Law
3. Contracts and Contract Law in Societal Context
A. Contract Law and Evolving Business Needs
B. Contracts of Adhesion
C. Function, Fluidity and Instructive Contracts
4. The Rise of Wrap Contracts: The Early Cases
A. Shrinkwraps
B. Clickwraps
C. Browsewraps
5. Contract Terms as Sword, Shield and Crook
A. Contract as Shield
B. Contract as Sword
C. Contract as Crook
6. Problems of Form
A. Is a Wrap Contract Just Another Contract of Adhesion?
B. Sadistic Contracts
7. Problems of Substance
A. Wrap Contracts and Norm Shifting
B. Getting Something for Nothing: The Old Bait and Switch
C. The Limits of Unconscionability and the Problem of Other Laws
8. The Sense and Nonsense of 'Wrap Contract Doctrine
A. What is Sufficient Notice?
B. An Outline of Wrap Contract Doctrine
C. A New Kind of Judicial Activism
9. Form, Function, and Notice
A. What is a Notice?
B. Intent and Consent in Contracts, Torts and Property
C. Contract Functionalism
10. Contracts in Wonderland
A. Contract Law and the Right of Publicity
B. Wrap Contracts and Federal Laws
C. Terms of Disservice
11. Reshaping Wrap Contract Doctrine
A. Imposing a Duty to Draft Reasonably
B. Tailoring Assent
C. Interpretation, Construction and Contract Form and Function
D. Environmental Coercion
12. Conclusion
Index

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Nancy S. Kim is Professor of Law at California Western School of Law, and Visiting Professor at Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego. She is Chair-Elect of the Contracts Section of the Association of American Law Schools, and a member of its Executive Committee of the Commercial and Related Consumer Law Section, as well as a past member of its Executive Committee of the Internet and Computer Law Section. She is a former Ford Foundation fellow and Women's Law and Public Policy fellow. Previously she was Vice President of Business and Legal Affairs of Exigen, Inc., a multinational software and services company.She has worked in business and legal capacities for several Bay Area technology companies and was an associate in the corporate law departments at Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe in San Francisco and Gunderson Dettmer in Menlo Park. Professor Kim has published more than twenty scholarly articles and essays, and her name has appeared in media outlets including the Boston Globe, slate.com, the San Diego Tribune, and the San Francisco Chronicle. She is a Contributing Editor to the Contracts Law Prof Blog, the official blog of the AALS section on Contracts.

Making Sense - Margot Northey and Joan McKibbin
The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law - Randy E. Barnett
Publishing Forms and Contracts - Roy Kaufman
The End of Negotiable Instruments - James Steven Rogers

Special Features

  • Explains why wrap contracts were created, how they have developed, and what this means for society.
  • Uses hypotheticals, cases, and real world examples.
  • Discusses court decisions with summary critiques.
  • Provides doctrinal solutions grounded in law and policy.
  • Defines and distinguishes different types of contract terms.
  • Includes actual wrap contract terms, flow charts, checklists and other visual aids to explain legal concepts.