We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Find out more

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Print Price: $55.95

Format:
Paperback
384 pp.
156 mm x 234 mm

ISBN-13:
9780198812401

Publication date:
August 2017

Imprint: OUP UK


The Unity of the Common Law

Second Edition

Alan Brudner

In this classic study, Alan Brudner investigates the basic structure of the common law of transactions. For decades, that structure has been the subject of intense debate between formalists, who say that transactional law is a private law for interacting parties, and functionalists, who say that it is a public law serving the collective ends of society. Against both camps, Brudner proposes a synthesis of formalism and functionalism in which private law is modified by a common good without being subservient to it. Drawing on Hegel's legal philosophy, the author exhibits this synthesis in each of transactional law's main divisions: property, contract, unjust enrichment, and tort. Each is a whole composed of private-law and public-law parts that complement each other, and the idea connecting the parts to each other is also latently present in each. Moreover, Brudner argues, a single narrative thread connects the divisions of transactional law to each other. Not a row of disconnected fields, transactional law is rather a story about the realization in law of the agent's claim to be a dignified end-master of its body, its acquisitions, and the shape of its life. Transactional law's divisions are stages in the progress toward that goal, each generating a potential developed by the next. Thus, contract law fulfils what is incompletely realized in property law, negligence law what is germinal in contract law, public insurance what is seminal in negligence law, and transactional law as a whole what is underdeveloped in public insurance. The end point is the limit of what a transactional law can contribute to a life sufficient for dignity.

Reconfigured and expanded with a contribution by Jennifer Nadler, The Unity of the Common Law stands out among contemporary theories of private law in that it depicts private law as purposive without being instrumental and as autonomous without being emptily formal.

Readership : Undergraduate; Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly, Professional & Vocational.

Part 1
1. The Crisis of Private Law
2. Private Law and Kantian Right
Part 2
3. The Unity of Property Law
4. Reconstructing Contracts
5. Jennifer Nadler: Agency and Autonomy in Unjust Enrichment Law
6. Recovering Tort Law
Part 3
7. Idealism and Fidelity to Law
8. The New Private Law

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Alan Brudner is Professor Emeritus of Law and Political Science at the University of Toronto. He is the author of The Owl and the Rooster: Hegel's Transformative Political Science (Cambridge, 2017), Punishment and Freedom (Oxford, 2009), and Constitutional Goods (Oxford, 2004). He was elected to the Royal Society of Canada in 2011.

Making Sense - Margot Northey and Joan McKibbin

Special Features

  • A thoroughly revised and rewritten edition of Brudner's classic contribution to the theory of private law.
  • Develops an account of private law that overturns the traditional divide between functionalism and formalism in explaining and justifying the law.
  • Reconceives the core areas of private law - property, tort, contract, and unjust enrichment as a unity of private and public law.
New to this Edition
  • Thoroughly revised and updated in light of developments in private law theory since the first edition.
  • There is a new chapter situating the book in relation to the so-called New Private Law.
  • There is a new chapter on the place of private law in Kant's philosophy of right, and a new chapter (contributed by Jennifer Nadler) on unjust enrichment.