Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.

Price: $35.50

Format:
Paperback 240 pp.
6 b/w illustrations, 6.125" x 9.25"

ISBN-10:
0199753806

ISBN-13:
9780199753802

Publication date:
January 2011

Imprint: OUP US

Share on Facebook

Add to Favourites Tell a Friend


Coalitions of Convenience

United States Military Interventions after the Cold War

Sarah E. Kreps

When the Clinton Administration sent the United States military into Haiti in 1994, it first sought United Nations authorization and assembled a large coalition of allies. With a defense budget 20 times the entire GDP of Haiti, why did the US seek multilateral support when its military could quickly and easily have overpowered the 7,600-soldier Haitian army? The US has enjoyed unrivaled military power after the Cold War and yet in eight out of ten post-Cold War military interventions, it has chosen to use force multilaterally rather than going alone. Why does the US seek allies when, as the case of Haiti so starkly illustrates, it does not appear to need their help? Why in other instances such as the 2003 Iraq War does it largely sidestep international institutions and allies and intervene unilaterally?

In Coalitions of Convenience, Sarah E. Kreps answers these questions through a study of US interventions after the post-Cold War. She shows that even powerful states have incentives to intervene multilaterally. Coalitions and international organization blessing confer legitimacy and provide ways to share what are often costly burdens of war. But those benefits come at some cost, since multilateralism is less expedient than unilateralism. With long time horizons--in which threats are distant--states will welcome the material assistance and legitimacy benefits of multilateralism. Short time horizons, however, will make immediate payoffs of unilateralism more attractive, even if it means foregoing the longer-term benefits of multilateralism.

Coalitions of Convenience ultimately shows that power may create more opportunities for states such as the US to act alone, but that the incentives are stacked against doing so. The implications of the argument go beyond questions of how the US uses force. They speak to questions about how the world works when power is concentrated in the hands of one state, how international institutions function, and what the rise of China and resurgence of Russia may mean for international cooperation and conflict.

Readership : Students and scholars of international relations, US foreign policy, and international security studies.

1. Introduction
2. Defining Cooperation under Unipolarity
3. Explaining Cooperation in Post-Cold War Military Interventions
4. The Gulf War and the New World Order
5. Haiti: Quid Pro Quo Multilateralism
6. Afghanistan: The Mission Determines the Coalition
7. Iraq, the United States, and the 'Coalition of the Willing'
8. Conclusion
Notes
Index

There are no Instructor/Student Resources available at this time.

Sarah E. Kreps is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Government at Cornell University. She previously held fellowships at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, and the Miller Center for Public Affairs, University of Virginia. Between 1999-2003, Kreps served as an active duty officer in the United States Air Force.

Globalization and the National Security State - Norrin M. Ripsman and T.V. Paul
The Iraq Papers - Edited by John Ehrenberg, J. Patrice McSherry, José Ramon Sánchez and Caroleen Marji Sayej
To Lead the World - Edited by Melvyn P. Leffler and Jeffrey W. Legro
Making Sense in the Social Sciences - Margot Northey, Lorne Tepperman and Patrizia Albanese

Special Features

  • Addresses one of the most hotly debated issues of foreign policy in the last decade: How the United States uses military force abroad.
  • Kreps's argument sheds light on questions about how the world works when power is concentrated in the hands of one state, how international institutions function, and what the rise of China and resurgence of Russia may mean for international cooperation and conflict.
  • The author is a political scientist, but her thinking is also informed by her own recent military experience.